Actionbets ag -
casinos and lottery [ 5 ], Internet gambling is prolific and growing [ 6 ]. Therefore, examining the influence of Internet gambling on public health is important. Research examining land-based gambling suggests that adverse gambling-related outcomes often include financial distress, emotional and physical deterioration, and damaged interpersonal relationships [ 7 ].
Some research suggests that disordered gambling relates to poor mental health, such as personality and psychiatric disorders [ 8 , 9 ]. Researchers, public policy makers, and public health officials have argued that Internet gambling is associated with similar public health threats [ 10 — 13 ].
One study reported that Internet gambling was linked to pathological gambling and associated with poor physical and mental health [ 14 ]. Because this is the only study providing empirical data about health correlates of Internet gambling, and because this study provides results based on retrospective self-reports of a locally restricted sample of patients in clinic waiting areas, what we actually know about the health dangers of Internet gambling remains limited.
Speculations about potential hazards particular to Internet gambling include the apparent lack of fail-safes, such as the inability to protect individuals who are underage or people known to have gambling-related problems and to prevent gambling while intoxicated or gambling at work [ 15 ].
However, the Internet also provides a unique opportunity for implementing special safeguards and harm reduction efforts. For example, tracking software can record all gambling online activity, which companies could potentially use to control the extent of gambling by specific users.
Web-based technology could limit the time per gambling session or the amount of money participants can use to gamble. Recent recommendations for Internet gambling operators include accepting payments with credit cards only, providing options to self-limit gambling expenditure, and providing options that allow users to self-exclude from an Internet site [ 16 ].
In this study, we explore a harm reduction feature currently unique to Internet gambling. As part of their corporate social responsibility agenda, a large Internet sports betting service provider, bwin Interactive Entertainment, AG bwin , imposes limits on the amount of money that users can deposit into their online gambling accounts within a given time period.
When a user tries to deposit more than the allowed amount, bwin sends the user a notification message about the attempt to exceed deposit limits and rejects the attempted deposit.
We expected that users who received a notification message constitute a group of extremely engaged gamblers, and we therefore hypothesized that exceeding deposit limits would be associated with unfavorable gambling behavior, such as excessively large betting, high losses or high frequency of playing i.
Furthermore, we expected that receiving a notification message would act as a warning sign to users; consequently, we hypothesized that exceeding deposit limits would attenuate gambling behavior that followed exceeding the limit.
To examine these possibilities, this study compares 1 the gambling behavior of those who exceeded deposit limits with those who did not, and 2 the gambling behavior of consumers before and after exceeding deposit limits. The research cohort included people who registered with bwin between February 1 and February 28, , and who deposited money in their accounts before February 28, bwin is primarily an Internet sports gambling service, offering two types of sports bets: fixed-odds bets and live-action bets.
Fixed-odds bets are made on the outcomes of sporting events or games before the events begin. The amount paid for a winning bet is set fixed by the betting service at the time of the bet. Live-action bets are made while the event is in progress. In addition to bets on the outcome of the event, the betting service offers bets on selected outcomes within the sporting event e.
Fixed-odds bets are relatively slow-cycling betting propositions. The outcomes of a bet are generally not known for hours or days later.
In contrast, live-action bets provide relatively quick-paced betting propositions posed in real-time during the progress of a sporting event. Consequently, these subscribers were excluded from the study, leaving sports-betting subscribers for the current analysis. This cohort consisted of The mean age of subscribers was The majority, More specifically, this dataset included the daily aggregates of betting activity i.
bwin provides several ways of limiting the amount of money that users can deposit in their accounts.
By default, bwin does not allow users to deposit more than Euros per 24 hours or Euros per 30 days or currency equivalents. One exception to this default is a flexible limit system, which automatically increases allowable deposit limits by the subscribers' amount of winnings from gambling.
A second exception occurs when subscribers can evidence exceptional financial means. In such cases, users may have higher deposit limits. At the other end of the spectrum, users can choose to set for themselves lower maximum deposit amounts per 30 days. Users repeatedly can adjust these self-limits to their needs.
Exceeding any deposit limit leads bwin to issue a notification message. Although we have information about if and when a user received such notification, we do not have information about the type of limit i. Thus, this study explores the combined effects of exceeding company- and self-imposed deposit limits.
Based on the daily aggregates of betting activity, we computed four measures of gambling behavior for each user: percentage of days within the active period from first to last betting day on which the user placed bets i.
These measures are more adequate than gross totals of number of bets or money wagered when comparing the gambling behavior of different users. Each measure was computed for fixed-odds and live-action betting separately, aggregated across the total 2-year observation period. Further, within the subset of people who received a notification message, each measure was computed for the period of time before as well as after the first receipt of a notification message note that the day of receipt of the notification message was defined as an 'after' day.
We defined the percentage of active betting days as the percent of days within the interval from the first to the last betting day that included a bet. We obtained the average number of bets per active betting day by dividing the total number of bets made by the total number of active betting days, and the average size of bets in Euro by dividing the total money wagered by the total number of bets.
These two gambling behavior measures were highly positively skewed with many cases on the left and fewer cases but still substantial numbers due to the large sample size on the right side of the distribution.
Log-transformations were performed to generate normal distributions for these measures. We calculated the percentage of losses by subtracting the total amount of winnings from the total amount of wagers and dividing the difference by the total amount of wagers.
This measure was highly negatively skewed and transformations did not help approximate a normal distribution. A total of users belonged to at least one of the fixed-odds MIB groups 2. In addition to providing descriptive statistics, we conducted two primary comparative analyses.
First, we examined differences in gambling behavior between users who did and did not exceed deposit limits using independent-samples tests. These tests employed the gambling behavior measures that were aggregated across 2 years.
We also looked to see whether the proportion of most involved betters was greater among individuals who exceed limits compared to those who did not. Second, we analyzed individuals' differences in gambling behavior before and after exceeding deposit limits within users who exceeded limits using paired-samples tests.
These tests compared the gambling behavior measures that were created for the period of time before and after receipt of the notification message. The procedures of limiting deposits and sending notifications were only in effect starting late September , about 8 months after the beginning of our study.
Users of our cohort experienced no restrictions to the amount of money they could deposit during the first 8 months after they registered with bwin. This could potentially bias our findings: On one side, only a subset of people who registered in February was still active in September e.
Short-term bettors might exhibit a low extent of gambling behavior, potentially resulting in overestimating the differences between users who did and did not exceed limits. We therefore repeated the analyses within the subset of users who had deposited money after September Alternatively, certain deposit activities could have been possible before September , but might have conflicted with company-imposed or self-imposed deposit limits after September For example, people could deposit very large amounts during the first 8 months but not after September People might have chosen to self-limit their deposit amount but had no option to do so before September We had no means of identifying people who would have been subject to one of the limits before September , and thus no means of excluding these people from the analyses.
However, in our analyses these people are considered users who did not exceed limits, yielding conservative estimates for the comparisons of users who did and did not exceed limits.
Analyses involving the average number of bets per active betting day and the average size of bets in Euro used the log-transformed variables; however, we report means, standard deviations, and medians for the untransformed variables for descriptive purposes.
Of the sports bettors, 0. Five 3. Most of the bettors who exceeded limits played both types of games: Among users who placed both fixed-odds and live-action bets, 0.
Of the users, 5 3. One user had tried to deposit more than the allowed amount with the very first deposit. To describe the general distribution of deposits, we examined the maximum amount deposited per hour and day period among the sports bettors who never received a notification message.
Table 1 reports the mean SD and centiles for this measure. Table 2 presents a comparison of gambling behavior aggregated across 2 years for users who did and did not exceed their established deposit limits. Results were similar for fixed-odds and live-action betting. The percentage of active betting days for these groups was not significantly different.
The average number of bets per active betting day and the average size of bets were higher among users who exceeded deposit limits compared to users who did not exceed deposit limits. The distribution of the categorized percentage of losses was more favorable among users who exceeded deposit limits; that is, the likelihood of the lowest percentages of losses was significantly higher and the likelihood of the intermediate and the highest percentages of losses were significantly lower among users who exceeded deposit limits.
Despite losing a smaller proportion of what they wagered, users who exceeded limits still, on average, lost significantly more than users who did not exceed limits. Exceeding deposit limits was a significant predictor of being in the MIB subgroups.
For example, Further, Table 3 presents the associations between individual MIB groups and exceeding limits. Within the group of people who exceeded limits, we compared users who belonged to at least one of the fixed-odds or live-action MIB groups to users who did not belong to a MIB group on the gambling behavior measures.
Users belonging to a MIB group had a higher percentage of active betting days and a higher average number of bets per active betting day on fixed-odds and live-action, and a higher average size of bet on live-action.
The distribution of the categorized percentage of losses was not significantly different between users who did and did not belong to a MIB group. Table 4 shows the comparison of gambling behavior before and after exceeding deposit limits.
Of the fixed-odds players, had activity both before and after exceeding deposit limits and are included in Table 4 ; likewise, of the live-action players, had activity both before and after and are included in the Table.
Again, similar patterns of results emerged for fixed-odds and live-action betting. The percentage of active betting days and the distribution of the categorized percentage of losses did not change. The average size of bet increased and the average number of bets per active betting day decreased after exceeding deposit limits.
These analyses compare the fixed-odds players who exceeded limits with users who did not exceed limits, and the live-action players who exceeded limits with users who did not exceed limits.
Overall these analyses yielded the same pattern of results, although the percentage of active betting days was significantly different between the limit-exceeding and non-limit-exceeding groups for fixed-odds betting and the distribution of the categorized percentage of losses was not significantly different between the two groups for either fixed-odds or live-action betting.
The odds ratios for belonging to the MIB subgroups were slightly lower overall: between 4. The analyses of gambling behavior before and after exceeding deposit limits necessarily are identical to the overall results.
The company-imposed or self-imposed deposit limits affected only a minority of bwin Internet sports bettors. Very few people, only 0.
Furthermore, the vast majority of the sample i. This means that bwin could reduce the deposit limits substantially e.
One reason for the finding that the deposit limits were hardly exceeded might be that the sports bettors are highly responsible gamblers who bet for fun and spend relatively low amounts on betting.
Another reason might be that users are well aware of bwin's deposit limits policies and purposely avoid violating them. The deposit limits are presented as part of the general terms and conditions that every user needs to accept when opening an account with bwin. Our findings seem to indicate that knowing about the deposit limits prevented some bettors from exceeding the deposit limits and subsequently from losing money.
If this is correct, then the mere provision of deposit limits can serve as a harm reduction device. We examined whether the deposit limits seemed to safeguard the gambling behavior of the minority that exceeded the deposit limits. People who exceed deposit limits constitute a group of bettors who are willing to place larger bets than people who do not exceed deposit limits; yet, they appear to do this in a manner that keeps their percentage of losses lower than others in the sample.
Although the percentage of losses might be more favorable among people who exceed limits, compared to people who do not exceed limits, their net loss still is significantly higher.
Because these bettors place very large bets they are at high risk for losing very large amounts of money. We identified exceeding limits as a strong predictor for being in the MIB subgroups.
People who exceed limits are about 6 to 14 times more likely to belong to the various MIB groups. Consistent with this notion, we found that among people who exceed limits, people who belong to MIB groups show more intensive gambling behavior than people who do not belong to MIB groups.
That is, those who belong to MIB groups bet more often, place more bets, and place larger bets. Our comparison of the gambling behavior before and after exceeding limits found that exceeding the limits did not have a diminishing effect on gambling behavior. The number of bets was the only measure of gambling behavior that evidenced a minor decrease after exceeding limits.
This decrease was offset by a steep increase in the size of bets after exceeding limits. The number of days of play and the percentage of losses did not change. Thus, we found no indication that receiving the limit notification message influences users to curtail their betting activity.
Rather, the findings suggest that exceeding deposit limits encourages players to shift their strategy; they begin to make more calculated, informed risks with single large bets compared to before exceeding the deposit limit. The finding that the feedback about a violation of a policy or regulation does not have the intended harm-reducing effect is a finding consistent with other evidence about regulating behavior.
For example, people who were given feedback that their blood alcohol levels exceeded legal drink-drive limits have been nonetheless subsequently observed to drive [ 18 — 20 ]. Drivers who received speeding tickets have been shown to be at increased risk of receiving subsequent speeding tickets [ 21 ].
Likewise, smokers who were given biomedical feedback indicating negative effects of smoking did not initiate appreciable changes towards quitting smoking [ 22 ]. No differences emerged in the patterns of results for fixed-odds and live-action betting.
Fixed-odds and live-action propositions might differ in the extent of skill required to place successful i.
Whereas placing a successful bet in fixed-odds might be determined more by skill or knowledge than by chance, placing a successful bet in live-action likely is determined more by chance than by skill. Thus, we could have expected our findings to mirror the differing outcomes of games of skill versus games of chance.
Our findings instead show that, with regard to evaluating the risk of disordered gambling among people who exceed deposit limits, distinguishing fixed-odds from live-action betting does not provide additional information.
Our study examines conceptually different deposit limits. Some limits are mandatory and imposed by bwin : the default limits of Euros per 24 hours or Euros per 30 days, and the increase of the default limits by the amount of winnings.
The users voluntarily impose other limits: restrictions to a lower amount than the default limits, or exemption from default limits for users with exceptional financial means.
When exploring the effects of exceeding deposit limits, we combined the different deposit limits. Although different deposit limits are examined in this study, an essential similarity of all deposit limits is that they represent specific, predetermined maximum values that certain users are not willing to or are not able to comply with.
To this extend, the current study investigates effects of exceeding pre-set deposit limits. We can posit that different types of limits might be associated with different effects on gambling behavior. Therefore, an analysis differentiating the types of limits would have been desirable. Unfortunately, no information was available about the type of limit that led to issuing a notification message; thus this analysis was not an option for this paper.
It is important to note that the procedures of limiting deposits and sending notification messages were not in effect during the entire two-year study period.
We performed some statistical controls in our analyses to account for this fact, and the overall results remained largely unchanged. Thus, we consider our findings to reflect generalizable effects of deposit limits on Internet sports gambling behavior. The deposit limits examined in this study are part of the corporate social responsibility agenda of bwin.
This harm reduction practice is consistent with recommendations to integrate safety features for the prevention of disordered gambling into gambling websites [ 16 ].
This study indicates that current deposit limits affect only a very small minority of Internet sports bettors. The vast majority of Internet bettors seem to be able to regulate themselves and require little additional safeguards; however, some bettors can benefit from additional limits.
Consequently, for Internet gambling operators reluctant to include harm reduction measures, an interesting message is that a company's financial loss due to imposing such safeguards such as deposit limits will be rather small and balanced by the promoting effect of being regarded as a socially responsible company.
In this study, we saw that the mandatory limits exceed what most people are willing to spend on Internet gambling activities. However, the mandatory limits also exceed what most people could possibly spend without taking substantial financial risks.
Thus, while the current mandatory limits might help prevent the loss of extremely large amounts of money and cases of bankruptcy, these limits still allow users to transfer substantial amounts of money each day and each month, which can lead to financial problems for gamblers without sufficient financial means.
For these cases, instead of the company-imposed limits, the self-imposed limits might have value. These people constitute a group of bettors who appear to be willing to take high risks; yet, surprisingly, they appear to do this rather successfully because their percentage of losses but not their net loss is lower than others in the sample.
Without deposit limits, the behavioral and financial consequences of gambling might be even more adverse. These unintended consequences of Internet gambling indicate that the bwin deposit limits could aid in the prevention of adverse gambling-related consequences.
More research is necessary to determine the extent of this influence and to monitor and revise such notification systems so that the promise of limits can be optimized.
For example, recent research suggests that gambling activity, or behavioral engagement in gambling, might be as important to consider as financial considerations [ 23 ].
For yearly contracts we accept wire payments to our Australian, UK, Hong Kong and US bank accounts. Instantly, providing your account and payment method passes fraud checks. Within 15 minutes in AEST timezone day light hours if it does not. Log In · Signup for Free.
EN DE FR ES IT Pусский 한국어 日本語 简体中文 عربي. Tools Web Technology Trends Keyword Lists eCommerce Lists. Lead Generation Market Analysis Sales Intelligence Future Customers Global Data Coverage. Screencast Demo Knowledge Base Exportable Fields FAQ. Home Trends Web Servers IIS 7 Usage Statistics IIS 7 Antigua and Barbuda.
Websites using IIS 7 Antigua and Barbuda Download a list of all 18 IIS 7 Customers Antigua and Barbuda. Download Full Lead List Create a Free Account to see more results. Website Location Sales Revenue Tech Spend Social Employees Traffic antiguagaming.
We know of , live sites using IIS 7 and 25,, sites in total including historical. Report Suggestions The more relevant a list the more chances of converting leads. Live sites using IIS 7 Websites currently using IIS 7. All sites that have ever used IIS 7 Websites currently and historically using IIS 7.
IIS 7 websites with an estimated Sales Revenue IIS 7 websites with an estimated Sales Revenue. IIS 7 websites with up to social followers IIS 7 websites with up to social brand followers. IIS 7 websites with to 10, social followers IIS 7 websites with between and 10, social brand followers.
IIS 7 websites with 10, to , social followers IIS 7 websites with between 10, and , social brand followers. IIS 7 websites with , to 1,, social followers IIS 7 websites with between , and 1,, social brand followers.
IIS 7 websites with over 1,, social followers IIS 7 websites with 1,, or more social brand followers. IIS 7 websites that list between 10 and 50 Products IIS 7 websites with between 10 and 50 SKU Products listed. IIS 7 websites that list between 50 and Products IIS 7 websites with between 50 and SKU Products listed.
IIS 7 websites that list between and Products IIS 7 websites with between and SKU Products listed. IIS 7 websites that list between and 10, Products IIS 7 websites with between and 10, SKU Products listed. IIS 7 websites with over 10, Products IIS 7 websites with over 10, SKU Products listed.
IIS 7 websites with High Visitor Traffic Volume IIS 7 sites that have a traffic rank in the top , sites on the Internet. IIS 7 websites with Low Visitor Traffic Volume IIS 7 sites that have a traffic rank outside the top 1 million sites on the Internet.
IIS 7 websites that were added recently IIS 7 sites that we recently detected in the last few months. Websites that have used IIS 7 long term Websites that have used IIS 7 for at least a few months. IIS 7 websites in Germany IIS 7 customers that have an address in Germany or a related TLD.
IIS 7 websites in the United States IIS 7 customers that have an address in the United States. IIS 7 websites in China IIS 7 customers that have an address in China. IIS 7 websites in the United Kingdom IIS 7 customers that have an address in the United Kingdom.
IIS 7 websites in Italy IIS 7 customers that have an address in Italy. IIS 7 websites in Australia IIS 7 customers that have an address in Australia.
IIS 7 websites in Argentina IIS 7 customers that have an address in Argentina. IIS 7 websites in Czech Republic IIS 7 customers that have an address in Czech Republic. IIS 7 websites in APAC countries IIS 7 customers that have an address in APAC countries. IIS 7 websites in AMER countries IIS 7 customers that have an address in AMER countries.
IIS 7 websites in EMEA countries IIS 7 customers that have an address in EMEA countries. IIS 7 websites in BRICS countries IIS 7 customers that have an address in BRICS countries.
IIS 7 websites in LATAM IIS 7 customers that have an address in LATAM. IIS 7 websites in the European Union IIS 7 customers that have an address in the European Union.
IIS sites using IIS 7 IIS 7 websites that are also using IIS.
Harm Reduction Heyspin casino no deposit volume 5Article number: 27 Cite this article. Metrics details. In an attempt to reduce harm related to acfionbets heyspin casino no deposit, an Internet sports betting actionbeets provider, a Interactive Actionbtes, AG bwinimposes limits on the amount of money that users can deposit into their online gambling accounts. We examined the effects of these limits on gambling behavior. We compared 1 gambling behavior of those who exceeded deposit limits with those who did not, and 2 gambling behavior before and after exceeding deposit limits. We analyzed 2 years of the actual sports gambling behavior records of subscribers to bwin. Ationbets Updated heyspin casino no deposit March 1 day ago. Free roulette use BuiltWith actionhets keep on eye actionbets ag emerging technology trends and actiongets been able to research new customer segments and leads. BuiltWith has been an integral partner in identifying key market segment opportunities for us. BuiltWith gives us the right amount of data mixed with intelligence to find prospects that matter. There's not a better tool to gain a competitive edge.
0 thoughts on “Actionbets ag”